Rabbit Hole Express
Episode 3, ‘Smoke signals’
Topic: Chemtrails, a discussion.
An opening statement:
when I started writing this I intended to write about global warming but then the universe got in my way, I kept seeing posts on the internet in forums and blogs about Chemtrails, then when seeing the most fantastic examples I have ever come across with my own eyes I decided to take the hint and dedicate my time to those little trails in the sky.
Its assumed by the uninformed that a Chemtrail is the natural result of an aeroplane flying at high altitude. This is not true, these are Contrails not Chemtrails, and they dissipate within a few minuets.
A Chemtrail is a trail that simply stays, and as its blown by the winds it spreads out wider and wider until eventually its vanished, a more innocent contrail fades from the far end to the closer. That's the obvious difference.
I first learned about this strange and worrying topic, as usual from the internet. I believe it was on Ross Hemsworth's forum that I saw it for the first time. Then eventually the rather fantastic 'Night Before' (no longer broadcasting) show on a my local radio station covered in some detail.
There seams to be a few schools of theory regarding this including plugging holes in the ozone layer, chemical population control, global weapons, making the sky.
Then there are the more popular theory's, the first is that some government agency is spreading chemicals into the atmosphere to in some way medicate the population without telling us. The other is that its a more advanced system for coating the atmosphere with chemicals that can be projected onto as the foundation for holographic illusions for Project blue beam (http://foxyurl.com/uIv) that the coating is in some way related to HAARP (http://foxyurl.com/uIw)
The official story.
The official story is that there are no Chemtrails, I am not sure what we are supposed to think when we see with our own eyes gridded patterns in the sky but we are assured by our government that they are not the fictional Chemtrails that we can see they are.
Wikipedia has this to say: In Britain, when the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs was asked "what research her Department has undertaken into the polluting effects of chemtrails for aircraft", the response was that "the Department is not researching into chemtrails from aircraft as they are not scientifically recognised phenomena"
well, I am glad we got that sorted. I can relax now. No point writing any further is there... well, actually, here are some examples of this not scientifically recognised phenomena that I found from google...
Here are some pictures I took with my little camera phone the other day.
so, these pictures are all normal contrails according to the British government, and the fact that I have seen similar things with my own eyes is not proof either, so. Lets see what happens if we ask them directly.
It seamed like the best place to start would be with British Aerospace. Wikipedia has an article about them here. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/British_Aerospace but it does not house an official website link or any contact details, that seams to be because since 1999 they have been known as BAE Systems plc.
That's a shock because I would swear that they have been referenced as British Aerospace in news reports many times over recent years. But this aside, they would appear to be the people I need to talk to.
Here's the letter I have emailed to them.
Sent to baesystemsinfo@baesystems.com
Subject: A question regarding contrails.
Dear sir/madam.
I have spent some time searching the internet for who to contact regarding aeroplane behaviour in my local area. No one at my local council appears to know who I should contact so my search (and wikipedia) has lead me to your organisation.
Could you give me more details or give the the contact details for some one who can give me more details on the contrails that aeroplanes leave in the sky often in gridded patterns that do not fade. This is known across the internet as 'Chemtrails' and I can find no reputable source that has a satisfactory response.
With thanks.
David smith.
When sending this I doubted I would get a response, and at the time of posting this blog (Weeks later) I do not have a response yet.
An obvious problem.
Considering the vast amount of talk regarding Chemtrails there is not that much actually 'said' the actual information regarding chemtrails is almost totally hypothesis. When it comes to this type of topic there is always an element of theory involved but usually there is a sliver of leaked fact or a drop of solid evidence.
We for certain the following:
Chemtrails are a real problem, anyone who looks up to see them in the sky knows that they are real, and by refusing to comment the government IS lying to us.
That's it, that is all we know for certain. There are story's of how the chemtrails are dropping traces of barium
(http://foxyurl.com/KiA) is supposedly proved. There have been cases of a spider-web-like substance giving people flu-like symptoms, this IS consistent with heavy metal poisoning but it has been isolated incidents and even though chemtrails where reported to be present, its unlikely that this is related (although with the H1N1 situation it maybe more likely than I first thought)
There appears to be little stock in the idea of them effecting weather patterns directly, I see no relation between chemtrails and cloud cover, rainfall or ambient temperature
Unfortunately with al the varying opinions and lack of any real hard investigation I do not see the point in expanding this article much past this point. I would really have love to have found more hard investigation as I researched for this article but there is little to go on, we can see the chemtrails but that's all we know.
Conclusion.
We are left with a single fact, chemtrails are real and no government body will acknowledge the existence of them, this in its self in my opinion is worrying. Its a shame more people don't look up.
On a personal level I believe they are in some way creating a canvas for a global shield (to defend from asteroids and aliens) or for projection (Project Blue-beam) to make that coming false flag event a little more convincing.
(please listen to The accompanying Podcast for this post found here: http://feeds.feedburner.com/RabbitHoleExpress)
